Artificial intelligence can do a lot. It writes, it paints, it even plays chess better than most people. But when it comes to actual intelligence—the kind that adapts, reasons, and understands context—it’s still miles behind the human brain.
Some tech evangelists claim we’re on the brink of artificial general intelligence (AGI). That’s the holy grail—machines that think like humans. The problem? No one agrees on what AGI actually is.
The Moving Goalposts of AGI
Ask ten AI researchers to define AGI, and you’ll get ten different answers. Some say it means AI surpassing human ability in a few tasks. Others insist it must be a fully autonomous, adaptable intelligence that can learn anything without specific training.
Most of the loudest voices on the subject work for companies trying to sell AI. That alone should raise an eyebrow. The actual scientists in the trenches—those who study intelligence itself—are far less convinced that AGI is just around the corner.
The Brain: Still the Only Real Intelligence
If AGI means anything, it means intelligence that isn’t narrowly focused. Humans aren’t just good at one task; they’re good at making connections across different fields, solving unexpected problems, and adapting to entirely new situations.
AI? Not so much. Today’s systems don’t think. They predict. Everything they do is based on statistical probabilities and pattern recognition, not understanding. The fact that they can generate coherent text or play Go at a high level doesn’t mean they “know” anything.
A Machine That Forgets What It Just Learned
One of AI’s biggest weaknesses? Memory. Human brains build on knowledge, refining concepts and making connections over time. AI models, on the other hand, often forget what they’ve just learned the moment the training stops.
The latest AI models get better at predicting words or generating images, but they don’t comprehend what they’re doing. Tell a human a joke, and they can explain why it’s funny. AI just regurgitates patterns it has seen before.
The Illusion of Intelligence
AI can be convincing. It can chat, write, and even mimic human emotion. But behind the scenes, it’s just a sophisticated guessing game. When AI gets something wrong, it doesn’t realize its mistake. It just confidently spits out nonsense.
When a human says something wrong, they can reflect, reassess, and correct themselves. AI? It keeps making the same mistakes unless explicitly retrained by engineers.
The Road to Real AGI
Could AGI happen? Maybe. But not the way it’s being hyped. If AGI ever arrives, it won’t be a slightly better chatbot or a more advanced image generator. It will be something fundamentally different—something that actually understands, reasons, and learns without human oversight.
For now, there’s one proven example of general intelligence: the human brain. And AI, no matter how flashy, still doesn’t come close.
—
Five Fast Facts
- AI models like ChatGPT have no memory of past conversations unless specifically designed to retain context.
- The human brain processes information using around 100 trillion synapses, vastly outclassing any AI model.
- Deep Blue, the chess AI that beat Garry Kasparov in 1997, couldn’t play checkers—it was built for one single task.
- The Turing Test, long considered a benchmark for AI intelligence, can be fooled by simple trickery rather than true understanding.
- Despite AI’s rapid growth, no machine has ever independently formed a new scientific theory without human input.
